అయోధ్య వివాదం పై సుప్రీం కోర్టు తీర్పులో ఏముంది?||What is there in Supreme Court Ayodya Verdict||

The Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ayodhya matter has settled the ‘title suit’ in favour of the main Hindu plaintiff – essentially the Vishwa Hindu Parishad – but it is clear that there is much more at stake for the country than the ownership of 2.77 acres of land on which a mosque stood for 470 years until it was demolished in an act of political vandalism unparalleled in the modern world.

The court acknowledged the manner in which Ram idols were planted in the mosque was illegal and that the mosque’s demolition in 1992 was “an egregious violation of the rule of law”. Yet, the forces responsible for the demolition now find themselves in legal possession of the land. The site will be managed by a trust that the government will now set up. And he government and ruling party have in their ranks individuals who have actually been chargesheeted for conspiring to demolish the mosque.

prof k nageshwar,prof k nageshwar rao,mlc nageshwar,supreme court on ayodhya,ram lalla gets disputed 2.77 acre land,sunni waqf board,sunni waqf board alloted 5acre land,supreme court judgement on ayodhya,ranjan gogoi,ayodya verdictm,ram temple at ayodhya,trust to oversee construction of ram temple in ayodhya,ayodhya verdict,ayodhya case,prof k nageshwar analysis,